Feng describes how the numerous item and gold dupes, exploits, loopholes and imbalanced farms, thrown into the mixing pot with the Real Money Auction House (RMAH) and the Gold Auction House (GAH) has caused prices of even the lowest of items to spiral out of the reach of most dedicated rule-abiding players (Feng describes how the average top-level player can make roughly 50000 coins an hour, but with the discovery of these exploits prices have spiralled into the hundreds of millions).
Now, as stated above, I’ve never played the game, so I don’t have any way corroborate the information above. But as a single case, it is an example of the kind of worries I had about the Gem Store in Guild Wars 2. If you have read my 2c on the subject of the Gem Store you will know that I wasn’t hugely enthusiastic about it – not because of the way it has been implemented, but because I disagreed with the ethical thought process behind it. I’ve had to somewhat change my tune on this, mainly because from what I’ve seen the implementation of the feature in-game is deftly done and when play-tested by the thousands involved in the Beta Weekends, it seems to hold up to scrutiny and not cause the game to explode.
However, as with everything in the game atm, beta is beta. Just as those features which currently don’t work, might work once the game is released, so too those which do work in beta, might explode upon release. As stated on Henry Feng’s article, people will always eventually find the path of least resistance. Have ANet plugged all the holes? Experience says no, and that’s no criticism of ANet, that’s just the way it is – it’s the way the world works. It would be a mammoth job to predict the myriad of ways which players might pull and stretch every element of the game before the eventual moment when they find a way to break it.
The real test is how the game holds up when ANet have to start fire-fighting, when the system inevitably creaks will the kind people of Seattle be able to bring it back into line with the game intact? Considering the 7 year life-span of Guild Wars 1, experience says yes.
SIDE NOTE:
Really interesting post, thanks for highlighting the D3 post too.
ReplyDeleteRegarding putting out fighting and such, the only thing I have to add is that by limiting transactions to go through the "house" ArenaNet have ensured they remain in control. With an economist on the development team, this means he'll get full control of taxes and such to bring balance. And worst case scenario, trading can be stopped and rollbacks can be applied to prevent the run away disaster that's happened in D3.
There's also more incentive to cheat in D3 as you can get real money out of the system, which can't be done in GW2.
True - the vital difference between the systems is that final trade of in-game items for IRL money.
ReplyDeleteI did think it strange that ANet would have an economist on the team, and then put all the power in the player's hands when it came to determining the prices. I can't see them stepping in too much, but it's good to know that they can if they need to.
D3 had been a hot mess since it was released. I started out having fun but that fun severely dropped off once I realized that I had to beat the game almost 4 times (each time with increasing difficulty) just to get decent items for max level. On top of that if I wanted to make money in any way I would pretty much have to farm inferno mode in act 4. It was disheartening and my playing partner and I quit. We did so just before the RMAH so things were expensive but not stupidly so. Fast forward about a month when I checked in...things that used to go for 5-10 mill coins were now going for upwards of 25 mill coins...or 150-200$ on RMAH. What a shame. What used to be attainable slowly but surely , was now out of reach. I uninstalled the game. Sad it had so much potential. I don't see this happening in GWs because the items that can be sold are NOT necessary and are basically cosmetic or fun...the ones in D3 are items people NEED for playing to the fullest. Huge difference.
ReplyDelete